<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: eMusic about to get a lot less awesome</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.progreviews.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=8067" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.progreviews.com/blog/?p=8067</link>
	<description>Music ramblings by Brandon Wu</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 00:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ground and Sky &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Wait, THAT was part of the fucking deal?!</title>
		<link>http://www.progreviews.com/blog/?p=8067&#038;cpage=1#comment-240</link>
		<dc:creator>Ground and Sky &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Wait, THAT was part of the fucking deal?!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 17:48:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.progreviews.com/blog/?p=8067#comment-240</guid>
		<description>[...] this eMusic business is way worse than I thought it was. As part of the PR rollout for the new pricing structure and the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this eMusic business is way worse than I thought it was. As part of the PR rollout for the new pricing structure and the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ben wolfson</title>
		<link>http://www.progreviews.com/blog/?p=8067&#038;cpage=1#comment-197</link>
		<dc:creator>ben wolfson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 22:54:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.progreviews.com/blog/?p=8067#comment-197</guid>
		<description>Agreed. From my perspective (and presumably yours and that of many others) what was nice about emusic was its less conventional selection. Lots of small labels, out (or just not very commercial) music, etc. So the price structure change doesn't even help me get what I want, particularly; the increased selection is &lt;em&gt;mostly&lt;/em&gt; without interest.

Admittedly if they were in financial straits, then on balance it might be for the best, but if it was just them caving to Sony's demands, I'm decidedly less sympathetic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed. From my perspective (and presumably yours and that of many others) what was nice about emusic was its less conventional selection. Lots of small labels, out (or just not very commercial) music, etc. So the price structure change doesn&#8217;t even help me get what I want, particularly; the increased selection is <em>mostly</em> without interest.</p>
<p>Admittedly if they were in financial straits, then on balance it might be for the best, but if it was just them caving to Sony&#8217;s demands, I&#8217;m decidedly less sympathetic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eMusic&#8217;s New Pricing &#124; Avant Music News</title>
		<link>http://www.progreviews.com/blog/?p=8067&#038;cpage=1#comment-189</link>
		<dc:creator>eMusic&#8217;s New Pricing &#124; Avant Music News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 14:49:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.progreviews.com/blog/?p=8067#comment-189</guid>
		<description>[...] uproar is deafening. I&#8217;ve blogged about how I feel, as has Brandon Wu, and others. Check out eMusic&#8217;s official blog and the hundreds of negative comments that they [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] uproar is deafening. I&#8217;ve blogged about how I feel, as has Brandon Wu, and others. Check out eMusic&#8217;s official blog and the hundreds of negative comments that they [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
